Three Paths for Blockchain Interaction Potential – And Why Validity Proofs Are the Future

Cross-chain interoperability ( blockchain interoperability) is one of the most important and complex issues in the Web3 field. Each protocol has its own philosophy to address this, but not every path can balance speed, security, and decentralization. To understand the breakthrough in @SuccinctLabs's approach, we first need to look back at the three main models that current protocols are using.

1. Trusted Committee (Multisig & MPC Bridges) How it works: An external group of validators monitors activities on Chain A. When they detect an event (, for example: holding token ), they collectively sign off and send a message to Chain B. When the majority of members reach consensus, the action on Chain B is executed. Exchange point: Advantages: Fast, smooth user experience. Disadvantages: All trust is placed in the “selective” validator group. If they are attacked or collude, users' assets will be at risk. Reality has proven: Many bridge hacks worth hundreds of millions of USD stem from this model, as it has become a “juicy target” for hackers.
2. Optimistic approach (Optimistic Bridges with Fraud Proofs) How it works: Messages from Chain A to Chain B are by default accepted as valid. However, during a “challenge period” (, anyone can submit a ) fraud proof ( to invalidate the erroneous transaction. Exchange rate: Advantages: No longer dependent on a small group of validators, security based on community mechanisms. Disadvantages: Very slow speed. Users have to wait from a few hours to a few days for transactions to be truly confirmed. This leads to wasted capital and a poor experience.
3. The path of Succinct – Validity Proofs )ZK-SNARKs( How it works: Each message sent comes with a )validity proof( that confirms its validity directly on the underlying chain. In other words, instead of “waiting to see if anyone detects fraud,” the system ensures “validity from the start.” Trade-off: Advantages: Maximum security: Not dependent on any human or assumption other than mathematical correctness. High speed: Proofs are verified in a few seconds, almost instantaneously. No latency: No need for a prolonged “challenge period” like Optimistic. Disadvantages: The proof generation process requires significant computational power. However, this occurs off-chain, and technology is advancing rapidly, helping to reduce costs. Conclusion – The future belongs to Validity Proofs Looking back at the journey: Multisig: A necessary starting point, but full of risks. Optimistic: A smart improvement, but at the cost of speed. Validity Proofs: A compromise solution – both fast and safe, while truly decentralized. In an increasingly expanding blockchain world, the demand for cross-chain asset and data transfer will become the backbone of the entire ecosystem. To achieve this, we need to eliminate both the assumption of trust and unnecessary delays. That is exactly why the Succinct model with Validity Proofs is considered the architecture of the future: a fast, secure, and transparent cross-chain interoperability platform, paving the way for a more seamless Web3 than ever before. #SuccinctLabs ​$PROVE {spot})PROVEUSDT(