In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between DoubleZero (2Z) vs The Graph (GRT) has been an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only show significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance but also represent different positions in crypto assets.
DoubleZero (2Z): Since its launch, it has gained market recognition for its decentralized framework for creating and managing high-performance decentralized networks.
The Graph (GRT): Introduced in 2020, it has been hailed as a decentralized protocol for indexing and querying blockchain data, primarily applied to Ethereum.
This article will provide a comprehensive analysis of the investment value comparison between 2Z and GRT, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, attempting to answer the question most crucial to investors:
"Which is the better buy right now?"
Click to view real-time prices:
Disclaimer
2Z:
年份 | 预测最高价 | 预测平均价格 | 预测最低价 | 涨跌幅 |
---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 0.2895312 | 0.25851 | 0.232659 | 0 |
2026 | 0.380888634 | 0.2740206 | 0.172632978 | 5 |
2027 | 0.41259281742 | 0.327454617 | 0.23249277807 | 26 |
2028 | 0.5476351014708 | 0.37002371721 | 0.1961125701213 | 42 |
2029 | 0.633184584889752 | 0.4588294093404 | 0.279885939697644 | 76 |
2030 | 0.666128536480392 | 0.546006997115076 | 0.349444478153648 | 110 |
GRT:
年份 | 预测最高价 | 预测平均价格 | 预测最低价 | 涨跌幅 |
---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 0.0815244 | 0.06628 | 0.0483844 | 0 |
2026 | 0.100506992 | 0.0739022 | 0.039907188 | 11 |
2027 | 0.1177262046 | 0.087204596 | 0.04621843588 | 30 |
2028 | 0.119884518351 | 0.1024654003 | 0.09221886027 | 53 |
2029 | 0.136745199970365 | 0.1111749593255 | 0.10450446176597 | 67 |
2030 | 0.151231297170477 | 0.123960079647932 | 0.100407664514825 | 86 |
⚠️ Risk Warning: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile, and this article does not constitute investment advice. None
Q1: What are the main differences between 2Z and GRT? A: 2Z focuses on creating and managing high-performance decentralized networks, while GRT is a protocol for indexing and querying blockchain data, primarily applied to Ethereum. GRT has a more established ecosystem and is widely used in DeFi applications, while 2Z has potential for growth in decentralized network performance.
Q2: Which token has shown better price performance recently? A: Based on the provided data, 2Z has shown better recent price performance. As of October 16, 2025, 2Z is priced at $0.2595, while GRT is at $0.06657. However, both tokens have experienced significant losses in the current market cycle.
Q3: How do the supply mechanisms differ between 2Z and GRT? A: GRT uses an inflationary model with controlled token release to incentivize network participants. The supply mechanism for 2Z is not explicitly stated in the given information.
Q4: What are the key factors affecting the investment value of these tokens? A: Key factors include supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, market applications, technical development, ecosystem building, macroeconomic factors, and market cycles. Additionally, regulatory attitudes and geopolitical factors can impact their value.
Q5: What are the predicted price ranges for 2Z and GRT in 2030? A: For 2Z, the base scenario predicts $0.35-$0.55, with an optimistic scenario of $0.55-$0.67. For GRT, the base scenario predicts $0.10-$0.12, with an optimistic scenario of $0.12-$0.15.
Q6: How should investors approach risk management when investing in 2Z and GRT? A: Conservative investors might consider allocating 30% to 2Z and 70% to GRT, while aggressive investors might allocate 60% to 2Z and 40% to GRT. Hedging tools such as stablecoin allocation, options, and cross-currency portfolios can also be used to manage risk.
Q7: What are the main risks associated with investing in 2Z and GRT? A: The main risks include market risk (volatility and overall crypto market trends), technical risk (scalability, network stability, query efficiency, data accuracy), and regulatory risk (potential impacts of global regulatory policies on data management and decentralized networks).
Q8: Which token might be more suitable for different types of investors? A: New investors might consider a balanced approach with a slight bias towards GRT for its established use cases. Experienced investors could explore opportunities in both tokens, adjusting allocation based on risk tolerance. Institutional investors may evaluate GRT for its potential as blockchain data infrastructure while monitoring 2Z's development.
Share
Content